Follow us on Google Get our news on Discover Follow

A 900-megawatt reactor on the French coast came off the grid at four in the afternoon and a second one overnight, both shut by hand before returning jellyfish could pack the seawater screens and trip them, and both were back inside four days against twenty for the last swarm

A 900-megawatt reactor on the French coast came off the grid at four in the afternoon and a second one overnight, both shut by hand before returning jellyfish could pack the seawater screens and trip them, and both were back inside four days against twenty for the last swarm

{{author_name}}

Luis Reyes

Sep 14, at 11:00am ET

An automatic reactor trip is the safety system doing its job, and it’s arguably the most expensive way to solve a problem. The unit drops off the grid in seconds, and then you spend the next several days walking it back up to full power while somebody writes the report explaining why.

So when the jellyfish came back to Gravelines in late August, nobody at the plant sat around waiting for that. At about four in the afternoon on Wednesday, August 26, local time, the crew shut unit 3 down themselves and dialed unit 2 back while they were at it. Overnight they did the same thing to unit 6 and reduced unit 1 too. EDF says it’s all preventive.

So you had a 5,400-megawatt site with nothing running at full power. Units 3 and 6 were off, units 1 and 2 were loafing along at reduced output, unit 4 had been down since August 10, and unit 5 was partway through its ten-year inspection.

If that sounds like a first for Western Europe’s largest nuclear plant, it isn’t.

The same site went to zero output for about ten days last August, and during the first swarm this month the last reactor still running flat out got throttled as well. What’s new is who pushed the button. It’s also been that kind of summer for the operator, which has already spent it idling inland reactors because the rivers beside them ran too warm.

Gravelines drinks the North Sea

If you’ve never looked at how a coastal plant gets its cooling water, it’s simpler than you’d expect. Gravelines doesn’t sit on a river. It pulls seawater from a canal connected to the North Sea, and everything that water carries hits two stages of screening before it reaches the condensers: coarse bar screens at the front, which EDF calls prégrilles, and rotating drum filters behind them. Pack those drums and the flow drops. Let it drop far enough and the protection system takes the unit off the grid for you, ready or not.

So why not let them trip?

A trip is a hard stop. Control rods drop, steam gets dumped, and the plant has to be checked over and lined back up before anyone talks about restarting. Taking a unit down on purpose gets you to the same place more slowly and leaves a shorter list of things to look at afterward. EDF hasn’t spelled that reasoning out, so I’m inferring it, but the restart times back it up.

Unit 3 gives the cleanest comparison, because it went down in both swarms for the same reason. On August 10 it tripped itself at 7:43 in the evening and didn’t come back until 3:55 in the morning on August 18, a bit over seven days. On August 26 the crew took it down deliberately and it was back at 2 a.m. on August 30, about three and a half days. That’s the same reactor and the same cause, and it cost half as much time.

Unit 6 did better still and reconnected at 2:30 in the morning on Friday, August 28. EDF published the night that one went down but not the hour, so I can’t give you an exact figure. Call it a day and a half.

Unit 3 · first swarm
7 days
Tripped automatically on August 10 at 7:43pm, back on the grid August 18 at 3:55am.
Unit 3 · second swarm
3.5 days
Shut by the crew on August 26 at about 4pm, back on the grid August 30 at 2am.
Unit 6 · second swarm
~36 hours
Shut overnight on August 26, back on the grid August 28 at 2:30am. EDF did not publish the shutdown hour.
Unit 4 · longest outage
20 days
Off from August 10 to August 31 at 3am, with the last stretch logged as a technical fault.

The fishing fleet has doubled

France 3 Hauts-de-France, citing the plant’s management, reported six boats on the job by the end of August: three working offshore and three more inside the outer harbor around the clock, crewed by fishermen out of Boulogne-sur-Mer, Calais and Dunkirk. The same report put the catch at roughly 110 tons a day (100 metric tons) by late August, up from a few dozen tons a day at the start of the month, and about 3,300 tons (3,000 metric tons) taken out of the water since August 1. It doesn’t say how much of that was netted at sea and how much came out of the intake channel, and I’d want that split before calling the patrols a win. Six boats were pulling a hundred tons a day and the screens still packed twice in sixteen days. The swarm is arguably growing faster than the answer to it.

Four days before all this, a decree published in the Journal Officiel cleared EDF to start preparing the ground at Gravelines for two EPR2 reactors of 1,600 megawatts each. That’s permission for earthworks and site services, and it isn’t a license to build the reactors themselves. The investment decision covering the wider six-reactor program is due by the end of the year. Whoever ends up specifying the intake screens for that pair is presumably reading the same August the rest of us are.

EDF put unit 4 back on the grid at 3 a.m. on Monday, August 31, twenty days after the first swarm knocked it off. In the September 2 update, the only Gravelines reactor still down was unit 5, and that one’s exactly where it should be, in the middle of its ten-year inspection.

THE LOTvia The Lot
12 comments

Don't bite your tongue. Speak up.

Sign in with Google when you post
ROOKIE›DRIVER›ENTHUSIAST›EXPERT›LEGEND ★
@ondreiurban ROOKIE1 month ago
That's first sentence in the title doesn't make any sense..
1
@ondreiurban ROOKIE1 month ago
Two French nuclear reactors were deliberately shut down after jellyfish were spotted approaching their seawater intakes. Operators shut them down manually before the jellyfish could clog the screens and cause an automatic trip. Both reactors were restarted within four days. During the previous jellyfish swarm, restarting them took twenty days.
1
@gregorytillman ROOKIE1 month ago
Thank you 🙏
0
@starrfreeman ROOKIE1 month ago
Your a gentleman and a scholar thank you my friend for that TLDR;🙂
0
@stanstanleydard ROOKIE1 month ago
No doo doo you genius. We read the article
0
@pallasathena ROOKIE6 days ago
In terms of maintaining the balance, the jellyfish are out of balance. Both the U.S. and Europe are seeing record numbers of jellyfish. There are many reasons, but 2 cited in the literature are warmer waters and overfishing - fewer fish leaves more plankton for the jellyfish. These jellyfish are clogging up the mechanisms meant to keep them out. The article doesn't say anything about how other marine life is affected by the water intake.
0
@cjkersh ROOKIE1 month ago
So are they overfishing and hurting marine life balance to benifit the reactors and power generation?
-1
Joe Smith ROOKIE1 month ago
Imagine the sea life this one plant kills every year, if jellyfish can clog a screen to cause its closure. You would think the people that brought you the tower de Eiffel and the statue of liberty could figure out a way to draw seawater without this happening
-2
@elviejovaquerod ROOKIE1 month ago
Imagine the animals killed and displaced every year for you to drive on roads and live in your house that is in their habitat. Or the nature that is destroyed so you can have plastic/electronics/ clothing, etc . We as a world population have to scale back or live with the consequences.
1
@haroldbartko ROOKIE1 month ago
Jellyfish are not the problem. Did you know that jellyfish resemble an atomic cloud? It's a sign of things to come. Gambling with atoms is a dire and deadly way to generate power. Atomic power is a threat to the earth. In the future, people will have to learn how to live on 5 - 10 amps, not 100 per house. And local generation. It's a hard lesson to learn that even a 10 watt bulb can drain the solar battery at night in winter at a remote cabin. The days of 3,000 megawatt transmission are over it seems. Nature "spoke" through a jellyfish to warn the world that atomic power is not compatible with human life.
-3
@stephenkress ROOKIE1 month ago
Fact check - a 10 watt bulb would take 500 hours to drain a very small solar battery (5kWh). That's over 50 nights.
Wont get started on the other facts here
5
@elviejovaquerod ROOKIE1 month ago
While you complain about the world's thirst for electricity, you use a cell phone or computer to do so in a building with TV's, refrigerator, electric appliances, Etc all while also forgetting, that building took many natural resources and electricity to build for your comfort. Live by example
1
THE LOTOwner community
Visit →
Luis Reyes

Luis Reyes

With more than 14 years covering the automotive industry, Luis Reyes is a seasoned voice in the field. A law graduate, he channels his curiosity and expertise into the detailed analysis of national and international regulations that shape the automotive world. At Autonocion.com, Luis combines his strong legal background with a deep passion for vehicles — especially those that have left a mark on automotive history. His experience writing for multiple brands across the industry has established him as a trusted authority. Luis is committed to sharing his expertise and enthusiasm with enthusiasts and industry professionals alike, with a firm belief in the continuous evolution and innovation driving the auto industry forward.
Contact: info@autonocion.com
autoNotion · The Box