Follow us on Google Get our news on Discover Follow

A Finnish company just fed pure hydrogen to a 13,000-horsepower piston engine the size of a bus and put the electricity on Spain’s national grid, the world’s first large-scale engine running on 100% hydrogen

A Finnish company just fed pure hydrogen to a 13,000-horsepower piston engine the size of a bus and put the electricity on Spain’s national grid, the world’s first large-scale engine running on 100% hydrogen

{{author_name}}

By: Luis Reyes

Published: Jun 12, at 9:00am ET

Toyota has spent more than three decades telling anyone who will listen that hydrogen belongs inside a fuel cell, where it gets converted to electricity through a quiet electrochemical handshake and leaves nothing behind but water vapor. At ACT Expo in Las Vegas last month, the company doubled down yet again: fuel cell Class 8 trucks in its logistics fleets by early 2027, Gen 3 stacks, freshly certified stationary generators, the full hydrogen society pitch.

Meanwhile, on the Basque coast of Spain, a Finnish company just did the thing Toyota’s playbook treats as a detour. Wärtsilä took a giant piston engine, fed it nothing but pure hydrogen, and put the electricity on Spain’s national grid. The company announced it Thursday as the world’s first demonstration of a large-scale engine running on 100% hydrogen. Not a blend. Not “hydrogen-ready” hardware waiting for fuel that never shows up. Combustion, the old-fashioned kind, burning H2 the way a diesel burns diesel, with customers flown in from around the world to watch it run in June.

The machine in Bermeo

The engine is the Wärtsilä 31H2, and it is not a science project squeezed into a shed. It comes off the Wärtsilä 31 platform, a medium-speed industrial four-stroke whose diesel version once took a Guinness World Record as the most efficient four-stroke diesel engine on the planet. In conventional form the 31 is a monster by car standards: roughly 15 feet tall, nearly 29 feet long, with a cylinder bore of 12.2 inches and up to 9.8 MW of output, call it around 13,000 horsepower. If you come from cars, that sounds unhinged. If you come from container ships, it is one of the smaller things in the building. Wärtsilä now describes the 31H2 as the world’s largest pure hydrogen engine, with its performance being verified in Bermeo.

The platform arrived in two flavors when Wärtsilä launched it back in 2024 as the first large-scale hydrogen-ready engine power plant. The 31SG-H2 runs on natural gas and digests hydrogen blends up to 25% by volume until you fit a conversion package and go full H2. The 31H2 is the headline act: built to burn pure hydrogen from day one, while keeping the option of dropping back to natural gas when the H2 supply gets thin. Until this week, that second engine was mostly a brochure. Now there is one in Bermeo making real electrons for the Spanish grid, and the platform behind it has over a million running hours and more than 1,000 MW installed worldwide, so the bottom end is anything but experimental.

Rasmus Teir, Wärtsilä’s Director of Technology Strategy & Decarbonisation, framed the trial as a test of whether engines can deliver “the flexible, dispatchable sustainable power needed to support future renewable energy systems.” Strip the corporate varnish off that sentence and it reads: when the sun goes down and the wind dies, somebody has to keep the lights on, and today that somebody usually burns natural gas.

Spain was not a random choice

Wärtsilä calls Spain one of the forerunners in renewable energy adoption, and picked it as the test bed partly for its push to cut exposure to fossil fuel price swings. But there is a rawer reason Spain understands this conversation better than almost anyone. In April 2025 the Iberian grid went down in a blackout that left the peninsula dark for hours. The official investigation traced the collapse to cascading overvoltages and voltage-control failures rather than to renewables themselves, but the event happened during a high-renewables window, and it turned grid inertia and firm backup from an engineering footnote into a national talking point. A machine that spins real iron, provides actual rotating mass, and burns a carbon-free fuel is aimed straight at that anxiety.

Bermeo itself is no pop-up either. It is one of Wärtsilä’s three engine-testing sites, alongside Vaasa in Finland and Trieste in Italy, where the company has spent years running P2X fuels like hydrogen, ammonia and methanol through single-cylinder rigs and full-scale engines. So the news is not that hydrogen can combust. Chemistry sorted that out long ago. The news is that Wärtsilä is now confident enough in 100% H2 at full industrial scale to wire the thing into a national grid and invite its customers to watch.

Two bets on the same molecule

Here is where the Toyota contrast stops being a cheap framing device and becomes the actual story. A fuel cell converts hydrogen electrochemically: efficient, silent, nothing out the tailpipe but water. Toyota has been at it for over 30 years, and its ACT Expo slate shows where that work is headed, including ANSI/CSA FC 1 and FC 6 certification for its stationary fuel cell generators aimed at hospitals, data centers and disaster sites.

One molecule, two machines
H2 COMBUSTION (Wärtsilä)
Burns hydrogen in a piston engine. Century-old turbomachinery know-how, tolerates lower-purity fuel, switches back to natural gas when H2 runs short. Trade-off: hot, fast flames create NOx that needs engineering out.
FUEL CELL (Toyota)
Converts hydrogen to electricity electrochemically. Silent, efficient, water vapor only. Trade-off: costly stacks, demands very pure hydrogen, and the membranes do not love being scaled to grid-size sustained loads.

Combustion runs the other direction. You burn the gas, you get mechanical work, you spin a generator. Less elegant chemistry, but with advantages a fuel cell cannot match at power-plant scale. The hardware is proven across a century of industrial use. Wärtsilä’s engine plants are built for extremely fast ramping with no minimum up or down time, which is exactly the profile a renewables-heavy grid pays for. And a combustion chamber is not picky: fuel cells need high-purity hydrogen or the stack starts to degrade, while a piston engine will eat pretty much anything you can ignite.

Neither approach wins outright. They solve different problems. Toyota wants to decarbonize the thing moving the freight. Wärtsilä wants to decarbonize the thing keeping the freight terminal lit at 3 a.m. when the solar farm is asleep.

The NOx catch

Burning hydrogen sounds perfectly clean, and on carbon it genuinely is, because there is no carbon atom in the fuel to oxidize. Air is the complication. It is roughly 78% nitrogen, and at combustion-chamber temperatures that nitrogen bonds with oxygen into NOx, the same pollutant family that wrecked diesel’s reputation. Wärtsilä’s own fuel researchers are blunt that “hydrogen combustion, on the other hand, is fast and happens at a high temperature,” which is precisely the recipe for making more of it, and the company says the entire combustion concept and aftertreatment chain has to be developed around that reality.

That is the unglamorous substance of the Bermeo trial. The headline is hydrogen on the Spanish grid. The actual work is injection geometry, mixing strategy, valve timing and whatever aftertreatment keeps the exhaust inside what a European regulator will sign off on. Get that wrong and the product never ships. Get it right and every gas-engine power plant on Earth has a carbon-free upgrade path.

What it means for the cars

For a site that mostly cares about things with wheels, Bermeo matters in a sideways but real fashion. The case against hydrogen passenger cars has never been the physics, it has been the pump. Our own coverage of the 2026 Toyota Mirai laid out the arithmetic: roughly $5,000 to cover 10,000 miles, around 70 stations in the whole country, owners holding cars they can barely fuel, and a $5.7 billion class action over it. Toyota’s answer has always been that the hydrogen society is coming. Patience.

What Wärtsilä just demonstrated is, in a roundabout way, a load-bearing piece of that society. If utilities decide hydrogen engines are how you firm up a renewable grid, somebody has to make green H2 in bulk. Toyota itself is positioning for that exact demand: under its partnership with plant engineer Chiyoda, the company said in March it plans to mass-produce 5 MW PEM electrolyzers from fiscal 2029, each good for around 100 kg of hydrogen an hour. Grid demand pulls electrolyzer volume, electrolyzer volume pulls distribution, and somewhere far down that chain a working pump might finally appear within range of a Mirai owner. Maybe. Eventually.

The nearer-term beneficiary is heavy transport. European engineers have spent years on hydrogen ICE for trucks precisely because the hardware looks like a modified diesel, with the same block and crank and different injectors, and we have already seen liquid-hydrogen systems built to retrofit into trucks, ships and aircraft without touching the basic architecture. Bermeo does not prove the truck case. It proves something one level up: that 100% hydrogen combustion now works at full industrial scale, on a live grid, in front of customers, and that the phrase “engines have no future in a zero-carbon world” needs an asterisk.

Toyota’s bet and Wärtsilä’s bet are not actually fighting. They grab the same molecule from opposite ends, one chasing the cleanest conversion inside a vehicle, the other the most flexible conversion outside one. The open question is which path scales faster, and whether either moves quick enough before batteries eat the rest of the lunch.

THE LOTvia The Lot
4 comments

Agree or laugh out loud?

Sign in with Google when you post
ROOKIEDRIVERENTHUSIASTEXPERTLEGEND ★
@borisjohnston ROOKIE1 month ago
How is the Hydrogen created?
0
@scottsnell ROOKIE1 month ago
Great article. Very well written, punchy style, knowledgeable, and informative. However, I think the death of carbon-based fuels and engines that burn them has been greatly exaggerated. Thanks in part to Trump's election, the climate panic spell has been definitively broken, and realism has reasserted itself. A consensus is emerging that a zero-carbon energy ecosystem is not feasible nor necessary, not just now but for the indefinite future.

Right now, any way you look at it, hydrogen is a losing proposition. It takes gobs of energy to extract, must be extremely pressurized at a minimum to be usable, presenting engineering and safety concerns .Or it must be liquefied, which requires even more energy, plus specialized storage to handle the intense cold. Find a natural source of H2 or figure out a way around the physics and maybe you've got a deal. Until then conventional hydrocarbon burning generators and conveyances are just too cost-effective and convenient to overlook.
0
@dorrisethel ROOKIE3 weeks ago
Appreciate the perspective, but declaring a carbon-free future dead is vastly premature. Political shifts offer temporary lifelines, not permanent immunity from chemical reality. You can argue with numbers all day but its hard to argue that we are not impactig our planet. I struggle to see how an approach centered on "giving up" is useful, and assuming zero-carbon ecosystems will never be feasible ignores the relentless march of technology. You are entirely right that hydrogen physics are brutal today. However, the goal isn't perfect efficiency; it is a net-positive system. We do not need a thermodynamic miracle, just a sequence of incremental engineering gains to tip the scales.

Burying your head in the sand and pretending a single election cycle changes the laws of physics or the reality of a warming planet isn't 'realism'—it’s just comforting delusion. It is incredibly naive to think the entire global scientific and economic community is going to stop inventing the future just because you’ve found a temporary political security blanket.You’ve convinced yourself that because hydrogen engineering is hard today, it’s impossible forever. That is a lazy, static view of technology.
-1
scottsnell ROOKIE3 weeks ago
@dorrisethel You misinterpret my comment. Net Zero is, for the foreseeable future, a wildly unattainable goal. The emerging consensus is that it isn't necessary, either. Climate change has been relentlessly depicted as an existential threat, full stop, a stance supported by almost no actual science. Yes climate change is real. It is also a permanent feature of our planet. Yes, human activities have probably enhanced, slightly, the existing warming trend, which is traceable to about 1680, when the Little Ice Age bottomed out and began to abate. We've had about a 1C increase in global average temp, principally in the Northern Hemisphere, over the last 170 years or so. That's an increase so slight that had it occurred in 170 seconds, you probably would not notice. You do not turn your society upside down, torpedo your economy, and turn your back on the source of energy that meets 80 percent of your needs because of such a slight change.

Climate panic is nothing more than a mass-formation psychosis, a condition to which our species is susceptible. There have been many over the years, and this is just the latest. The real climate threat is posed by cold, not heat. Our planet is probably less than halfway through the worst ice age in at least 250 million years. We happen to be alive during an interglacial period, a temporary lull in the cold, but we are just a couple of degrees of cooling away from yet another glacial outbreak, which WILL happen. It's just a question of time.
0
THE LOTOwner community
Visit →
Luis Reyes

Luis Reyes

With more than 14 years covering the automotive industry, Luis Reyes is a seasoned voice in the field. A law graduate, he channels his curiosity and expertise into the detailed analysis of national and international regulations that shape the automotive world. At Autonocion.com, Luis combines his strong legal background with a deep passion for vehicles — especially those that have left a mark on automotive history. His experience writing for multiple brands across the industry has established him as a trusted authority. Luis is committed to sharing his expertise and enthusiasm with enthusiasts and industry professionals alike, with a firm belief in the continuous evolution and innovation driving the auto industry forward.
Contact: info@autonocion.com
autoNotion · The Box