Follow us on Google Get our news on Discover Follow

A wind turbine built to stand 1,198 feet tall in eastern Germany can’t even get its three blades bolted on in strong wind, and once they’re on, hydraulic jacks still have to push its 827-ton top up through the lattice tower at 30 feet an hour to a hub height of 984 feet

A wind turbine built to stand 1,198 feet tall in eastern Germany can’t even get its three blades bolted on in strong wind, and once they’re on, hydraulic jacks still have to push its 827-ton top up through the lattice tower at 30 feet an hour to a hub height of 984 feet

{{author_name}}

Luis Reyes

Sep 24, at 9:30am ET

Construction crews lose days to wind all the time. Crane operators won’t fly a load in a stiff breeze, roofers pack it in early, and no one gets a story out of it. But when the thing being built is the tallest wind turbine on Earth, getting shut down by wind is frankly a little funny.

That’s where things stand in Schipkau, a town in the old coal country of eastern Germany about 71 miles south of Berlin. A Dresden engineering group called GICON has spent two years putting up a lattice tower there that’s supposed to top out at 1,198 feet, and the last big step was scheduled for Sunday, September 20. The weather scrapped it. Strong wind pushed the operation into this week, dpa reported, and the three rotor blades the machine still needs couldn’t even go on.

So what’s the last big step, exactly?

GICON assembled the turbine at a height cranes can actually reach. Hydraulic jacks now have to push it up through the lattice until the hub sits 984 feet off the ground, and the moving load comes to 827 tons (750 metric tons) once you count the inner tower it rides on. The climb runs at about 30 feet an hour, so you’d barely see it move.

So why can’t a crane just do this?

No one makes a crane that can set a nacelle at 984 feet. When a conventional wind turbine goes up, a big mobile crane stacks the tube sections and then swings the nacelle and blades onto the top, and that works because today’s tallest conventional onshore turbines stop around 820 feet in total. Schipkau tops that by well over 300 feet.

The industry has kicked around plenty of ideas for getting hubs higher, and we’ve covered a few of the stranger ones, from wooden modular turbine towers to a bladeless generator that skips the rotor entirely. GICON’s answer is a tower inside a tower.

The outer one is the wide lattice you see in photos, just under 525 feet tall and built like a power pylon that ate its vegetables. A slimmer inner tower hangs inside it, and the turbine got mounted on that one down low, where a crane could still do the honors. To finish the job, the inner tower rides up through the outer one like a telescope and locks in at full height.

Hydraulic strand jacks do the pushing, the same gear heavy-lift companies use to raise bridge decks. Picture a cylinder gripping a bundle of steel cables and crawling up them a few inches at a stroke, over and over, for most of a day. It’s slow, and it’ll move pretty much anything you bolt to it.

GICON hasn’t published how far the inner tower actually travels on this ride. Ingenieur.de, the German engineering association’s trade outlet, ran the known heights and figures roughly 430 to 460 feet of travel. At 30 feet an hour that’s about 15 hours of climbing, and GICON budgets around 24 hours for the whole operation, so locking the tower in place at the top takes up the rest.

TARGET
Hub height
984 ft
Where the hub ends up once the inner tower locks in. No crane on Earth reaches it.
Moving load
827 tons
Turbine plus the movable inner tower it rides on, pushed by hydraulic strand jacks.
Climb speed
30 ft/hour
Roughly 24 hours for the full operation, locking included.
Total height
1,198 ft
About 10 feet shorter than the Berlin TV Tower, Germany’s tallest structure.

The blades are still on the ground

The turbine itself is already sitting on the inner tower at crane height, but its three rotor blades aren’t on it, and as far as I can tell no English-language outlet has picked that up yet. GICON wanted every major component installed before the climb, and the wind that scrubbed Sunday’s start kept the blades from going on at all. Bolting them to the hub comes first. The 24-hour ride comes after. The company hasn’t put a day on either job.

GICON’s announcement puts it as “safety comes before speed,” and the company says it’ll call the actual start about 48 hours ahead. So the record could land any day now, or slide again if the forecast stays ugly.

Schipkau kept its community festival on for Sunday anyway, record or no record. I can respect that.

Why build a wind turbine this tall at all?

Because the wind up there is better. Air near the ground gets chopped up by trees, buildings and terrain, while a few hundred feet higher it blows harder and steadier. A turbine sitting in steady wind spends more hours of the year producing at full power instead of idling through lulls.

GICON didn’t guess at that. The company ran a 984-foot measurement mast at the site and logged the wind for a year before committing to the tower, and its numbers say the air at that height carries about 40 percent more energy, which it says works out to roughly double the electricity from the same rotor. Those are GICON’s own measurements. The machine gets to prove them once it’s spinning.

The turbine getting this record perch is honestly modest hardware, a 3.8-megawatt Vensys unit with a 413-foot rotor that GICON rates for at least about 18 gigawatt-hours a year. I suspect the modesty is deliberate. The tower is the experiment here. It stands in the middle of an existing wind farm because GICON’s pitch is a second story of wind power over land that’s already producing, and if the telescoping trick proves out, the company has floated building up to 4,000 of these towers across Germany. The federal innovation agency SPRIND has bankrolled the project since 2020, lately through a subsidiary called beventum.

The structure itself holds more than 2,200 tons of steel, held together by about 80,000 high-strength bolts, and German outlet t-online reports that every bolt field carries a QR code so installers scan it and torque it to spec. The build hasn’t been smooth, either. GICON broke ground in September 2024, lost the winter after its own quality control flagged faulty steel parts from a subcontractor, and restarted work on March 2, 2026, per the company. The steel shell was finished in mid-July.

GICON’s latest public word, from September 20, is that the climb happens sometime this week, weather permitting, with commissioning planned for late 2026. Once the inner tower locks in, the finished machine will stand 1,198 feet, about 10 feet shy of the Berlin TV Tower, and Germany’s second-tallest structure will be a wind turbine standing on the spoil pile of an old coal strip mine.

THE LOTvia The Lot
27 comments

What do you think?

Sign in with Google when you post
ROOKIE›DRIVER›ENTHUSIAST›EXPERT›LEGEND ★
@gertscheepers ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Well as a windmill is hoisted on fixed pivets a rope both sides to keep it steady and balanced and thus fitted into the holding bolts to fix it and its up all mounted on the floor . Is that more sensable ?
0
@josephdumas ROOKIE2 weeks ago
What about when the blades need to be replaced?
0
@maxpower ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Ummmmm,..... I'm going with "you replace 'em " for the win Bob.
0
@tom ROOKIE2 weeks ago
The ridiculous gets even more ridiculous! A disaster waiting to happen.
0
@maxpower ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Is that like waiting for the fly ash pools to over top its containment banks & decimate the surrounding area??
0
@simonandrew ROOKIE2 weeks ago
What a clickbaity nonsense. Of course you can't install turbines in a strong wind. That would be like trying to sharpen the blades of a circular saw while it's running. Get a life. Of course should have guessed is a us auto magazine
0
@georgeannmassey ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Killing our birds
0
@leejayfingersh ROOKIE1 week ago
You know what kills thousands of times more birds? Cars. And buildings, and power lines, and domestic cats, and pollution and habitat loss.
0
@andreasdemetrou ROOKIE2 weeks ago
I find it rather strange to put eastern Germany in the main title, like that's the important thing of the news piece. It wouldn't be noticeable if it was included only in the body of the article, but to put it in the title implies a separation and the usual subtle discriminatory remarks that we're used to seeing from European media. I wonder if there's a connection or just chance.
0
@markpaginton ROOKIE2 weeks ago
European engineers need to
concentrate on smaller more localised forms of energy production. It would create skilled jobs all over the country instead of these ridiculous vanity projects/white elephants!. Smaller and safer Localised Nuclear Power plants are also an option. Governments need to stop believing everything that Universities insist on are good for the environment. Universities have clever people but many of them lack the common sense approach when playing with tax payers money!.
0
@maxpower ROOKIE2 weeks ago
duncanwallbank Oh you mean you can't learn something new ?! Wow that's shocking !
0
@duncanwallbank ROOKIE2 weeks ago
All those statistics in feet. I'd need a voodoo witch-doctor and a grave digger to find someone who understands that.
-1
@emam ROOKIE2 weeks ago
On Financial Payback:
Wind energy consistently offers one of the lowest Levelized Costs of Electricity (LCOE) of any energy source. For this specific high-altitude project in Brandenburg, GICON projects electricity production costs below 5 euro cents per kilowatt-hour. Because it operates in stronger wind currents high above ground friction, it achieves significantly more full-load hours, breaking even on construction costs much faster than traditional onshore wind farms.
On Trees and Air Quality:
Zero New Forest Clearing Required: This high-altitude project is being built on an existing industrial wind farm site between existing turbines (a practice called "wind harvesting on a second tier"). It utilizes previously cleared infrastructure and unused airspace without requiring new deforestation.
Strict Reforestation Laws: In Germany, any project requiring tree removal is legally bound by the Bundesnaturschutzgesetz (Federal Nature Conservation Act) to fund equal or greater compensatory reforestation elsewhere.
Clean Air Protection: Wind turbines do not consume oxygen, nor do they emit nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, or fine particulates (PM_{2.5}). Replacing fossil fuel combustion on the grid is precisely what prevents air pollution, directly keeping the air clean.
0
@dansmith ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Divide by 10 and multiply by 3 to make feet into metres, use the calculator on your magic talky talky box if that's too difficult to do in your head.
1
@lostvagueness ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Or the USA could just meters like the rest of the world! Or would the American educstion system like us to use other outdated measurement systems to keep them happy? fathoms? Perhaps Cubits, or rods, maybe perches?... Even here in Britain, in the country that created the imperial measurement system, we were able to move on!
0
@jakeleslie ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Wind turbines require more energy to build, then they can produce over the expected life time. Add in gear oil, maintenance and de icing, they are completely Not Environmentally Friendly
-2
@emam ROOKIE2 weeks ago
This claim is directly contradicted by physics and life-cycle accounting. Modern commercial wind turbines have an Energy Payback Time (EPBT) of 5 to 12 months—meaning they generate all the energy required to mine, manufacture, transport, erect, and eventually decommission them within their first year of operation. Over a standard 20- to 25-year service life, a turbine returns 20 to 50 times the total energy consumed to build it.
Operational inputs like gear oil, hydraulic fluid, and thermal de-icing systems represent a tiny fraction of a percent of the energy and material budget. For high-altitude structures like the 300-metre GICON tower, the extra structural steel pays for itself even faster: higher winds at 300 metres yield up to 220% more electricity (30–33 GWh annually) using the exact same standard 3.8 MW generator. Accounting for maintenance materials, wind power remains one of the lowest-carbon, highest-return generation methods available.
1
@whrichey ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Your statement is completly false. Wind turbines will produce 20 to 35 times the amount of energy used to build, manufacture, deliver and setup. Need to do some research.
0
@wills ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Im sure that wind turbines have become cheaper to build..and will cost even less..the more they are used. They are doing much better than just breaking even.
0
@scottgage ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Not true, made up S$%t
0
@georgeannmassey ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Agree! 100 %
0
@davidranderson ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Google query /?q="do wind turbines require more energy to build then they produce in their lifetime"
0
@vanceberreth ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Just repeat what you heard on Fox News like you're informed, instead of actually looking into it. Helpful!
0
@leejayfingersh ROOKIE1 week ago
That's not just an error, it's a lie as there's literally no reason for you not to know better.
0
@virginiajames ROOKIE2 weeks ago
This is getting ridiculous. At what point will you break even on cost versus power produced? Where will you plant oxygen producing trees to replace those destroyed? We seem to forget that if we have no clean air, it does not matter how much power is available.
-4
@wills ROOKIE2 weeks ago
Do you live in Virginia? Youre not from here though..right? I see plenty of trees where I am in Virginia. If you have to live without electricity..Im sure you would not be happy. If you really cared that much you wouldnt be using electricity to comment about this. How will you be disposing of the lithium battery in that phone..what about all the little childrens?
0
@scottgage ROOKIE2 weeks ago
So when does a coal or natural gas power plant break even?
0
THE LOTOwner community
Visit →
Luis Reyes

Luis Reyes

With more than 14 years covering the automotive industry, Luis Reyes is a seasoned voice in the field. A law graduate, he channels his curiosity and expertise into the detailed analysis of national and international regulations that shape the automotive world. At Autonocion.com, Luis combines his strong legal background with a deep passion for vehicles — especially those that have left a mark on automotive history. His experience writing for multiple brands across the industry has established him as a trusted authority. Luis is committed to sharing his expertise and enthusiasm with enthusiasts and industry professionals alike, with a firm belief in the continuous evolution and innovation driving the auto industry forward.
Contact: info@autonocion.com
autoNotion · The Box