Follow us on Google Get our news on Discover Follow

As Tesla Passes Another One Of Its FSD Goalposts Without Autonomous Driving, It Has Become Clear It’s Likely Never Happening (And That Was Always the Plan)

As Tesla Passes Another One Of Its FSD Goalposts Without Autonomous Driving, It Has Become Clear It’s Likely Never Happening (And That Was Always the Plan)

{{author_name}}

By: Olivia Richman

Published: May 5, at 5:31pm ET

Get ready for Tesla to ignore another broken promise: Tesla’s vehicles have now driven over 10 billion miles using Full Self-Driving (Supervised) mode, according to the company website. Earlier this year, Elon Musk said that once Tesla reaches that threshold, its vehicles will be ready for “safe unsupervised” driving. That’s certainly interesting, since Musk just admitted a few weeks ago that FSD is nowhere near as capable as the autonomous driving he promised over a decade ago.

But we all know by now that Musk’s claims hold no weight. In fact, they’re considered so completely silly that one Tesla driver was even able to sue the brand for over $10,000 after waiting years for his vehicle to drive autonomously. The 10 billion miles thing was actually just a number Musk threw out there on X (formerly Twitter) because Tesla drivers wizzed past his previous goalpost without the brand coming any closer to autonomous driving.

In 2016, Musk wrote that the company would likely need 6 billion miles “before true self-driving is approved by regulators.” What regulators, nobody knows. In January 2026, the site claimed that Tesla’s FSD had been used for over 7 billion miles. But we all know why Musk ignored that goalpost. At that point, Musk’s robotaxis required a human inside or following behind, and drivers using FSD in their personal cars were seeing mixed results, prompting multiple investigations and lawsuits.

So yeah, I’m assuming the miles-driven thing will be moved again. Maybe 15 billion this time?

Will Tesla actually offer autonomous driving ever?

I think at this point we all know that none of these goalposts matter. Right? Musk has been promising a fully autonomous fleet of Cybercabs for years. However, we’ve had only barely functioning Model Ys in two cities, available at very limited capacity. A recent earnings call had Musk admitting that HW3 was nowhere near ready to provide autonomous driving to passenger vehicles either.

Join the conversation · The Lot
43 owners sharing real experiences

This hasn’t stopped the Tesla fans, of course. They continue to claim that Musk isn’t lying. He’s just saying it’s possible to have in the future. Just be patient! Well, it’s been over 10 years at this point. It’s also been about 10 years since we were promised the second-generation Roadster. But I guess we’re not supposed to care about that either. As long as it arrives eventually — even if it doesn’t function as promised — guess we should just accept it.

Anyway, Musk now claims that passenger vehicles are getting unsupervised driving by the fourth quarter of 2026. That’s pretty close. This is actually a bit horrifying to hear, since FSD is nowhere near that point right now. Some drivers will even need to buy entirely new vehicles to access a semi-improved version of FSD than they currently have. It just seems a bit far-fetched.

But I don’t think Musk cares. In fact, I think Tesla is relying on these ongoing promises as its marketing plan. If he can just keep setting new goalposts, Tesla drivers will hold on until then. It doesn’t sound very long to wait just a few more months. Might as well keep up hope and keep driving my Tesla!

Meanwhile, I don’t think Musk even wants these cars to have autonomous Full Self-Driving mode. Maybe his hideous Cybercabs, which have no steering wheel or pedal in preparation for being completely autonomous. But the passenger cars? I don’t think Tesla would even benefit from this.

Remember when I said Tesla was often getting sued for the accidents that happen while drivers use FSD? Well, most of these lawsuits end with Tesla winning: that’s because FSD is actually just a Level 2 system, which means someone should be ready to take control at any given moment. This means the driver is at fault if something goes wrong. Why would you let a Level 2 system drive you around!? (We won’t mention that it’s because they’re clueless enough to trust Elon Musk.) It’s probably in Tesla’s best interest to keep the cars at this level while claiming they are safe enough for a blind person to drive a Cybertruck. This keeps people driving without Tesla having to actually improve on the technology.

Because once it’s fully autonomous, Tesla would be at fault for what happens in that car. Right now, Tesla is saving a lot of money by staying Level 2. But Musk wants you to keep holding on and not give up. It seems like a pretty tricky balancing act, leading to all these silly goalposts, claims, and promises that Tesla fans keep explaining away.

If it were me, I’d give up all hope that Tesla’s passenger vehicles will get autonomous driving. Tesla itself has made it clear that it’s sorta bored of these vehicles anyway. It wants to focus on its autonomous robotaxis and humanoid robots. So quit askin’ for it!

THE LOTvia The Lot
2 comments

What do you think?

Sign in with Google when you post
ROOKIEDRIVERENTHUSIASTEXPERTLEGEND ★
@someuser ROOKIE5 days ago
Shouldn't you first be screaming at countries for not allowing FSD cars? If Tesla gave a free upgrade tomorrow for every car to get 10,000 sensors put on them it still wouldn't make a difference because it would still be illegal to jump into the back seat and have the car drive itself on 99.99% of roads in the US. The only way Waymo and Tesla can do driverless in a few cities is because they got special permits/permission. It has nothing to do with assumed automotive ownership legal "rights" for FSD enabled cars. The average person likely can't even get this special permission. So aren't you doing a "cart before the horse" argument?
0
@alanwells ROOKIE5 days ago
I think the past is that humans are wetware, and just a particular form of software, if you can do it in wetware, you should be able to do it in software. I made an engineering change to my New Prius and hardly do any highway driving any more, I just watch the scenery. I'm not confident enough to read a book, but a lot of the cognitive load is off. I do wonder what would happen if I fell asleep behind the wheel which I the ave done before many years ago and barely survived but I've been cruise control rather than the accelerator for many years., this is just another step. I'm not asking self driving to be perfect, I'm just asking it to be better than me.which it prey much is. Musk appears to shoot from the hip like Trump and both have remarkable track records and it will come in time. Thee will always be a perfection gap but humans are terrible at this. The line will be legal, not functional although we might have full self driving lawyers before we can have self driving cars.
0
THE LOTOwner community
Visit →
Olivia Richman

Olivia Richman

From esports to automotive, Olivia has always been a Journalist and Content Manager who loves telling stories and highlighting passionate communities. She has written for SlashGear, Esports Insider, The Escapist, CBR, and more. When she's not working, Olivia loves traveling, driving, and collecting Kirbies.
Contact: info@autonocion.com
autoNotion · The Box