{"id":8963,"date":"2026-05-26T14:30:42","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T18:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/?p=8963"},"modified":"2026-05-26T13:04:57","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T17:04:57","slug":"australian-renewable-energy-world-largest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/australian-renewable-energy-world-largest\/","title":{"rendered":"An Australian Mining Company Just Broke Ground on the World’s Largest Off-Grid Renewable Energy Network. One Million Solar Panels, 600 Megawatts of Wind, and Five Gigawatt-Hours of Battery Storage"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Monday, Fortescue Ltd. began turning dirt in Western Australia’s Pilbara on the latest piece of what its corporate communications team has started calling the largest off-grid renewable<\/strong><\/a> energy network ever built for heavy industry. The two pieces under construction are a 690-megawatt solar farm at a site called Turner River, about 120 kilometers south of Port Hedland, and a 74-megawatt, 650-megawatt-hour battery installed at the company’s Cloudbreak mine. The battery cells<\/strong><\/a> are made by BYD. The solar panels are made by LONGi. The wind turbines that will eventually go in around them are made by Envision Energy. All three companies are based in China.<\/p>\n

Less than a year ago, Fortescue walked away from a $550 million green hydrogen plant in Buckeye, Arizona, and a separate $A227 million green hydrogen project in Gladstone, citing changes in U.S. energy policy<\/strong><\/a>. The Australian project the company is now accelerating is roughly five times bigger than the Arizona facility it abandoned. It is in a different commodity. On a different continent. With a different set of suppliers.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
TARGET 2028<\/div>\n
BATTERY STORAGE<\/div>\n
4\u20135 GWh<\/div>\n
Total at full Pilbara Green Grid build-out. Supplier: BYD.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
SOLAR PV<\/div>\n
1.2 GW<\/div>\n
Four sites across the Pilbara. Supplier: LONGi.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
WIND<\/div>\n
600+ MW<\/div>\n
Nullagine Wind Farm 133 MW first. Supplier: Envision Energy.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
CORPORATE CAPEX<\/div>\n
$2.5B<\/div>\n
USD. Equivalent to AUD 3.56 billion. Fortescue figure, April 2026.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
TRANSMISSION<\/div>\n
620 km<\/div>\n
Planned high-voltage network. 480 km already in the ground.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
IRON ORE FY25<\/div>\n
198.4 Mt<\/div>\n
Record annual shipments. World’s fourth-largest iron ore producer.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What broke ground Monday<\/h2>\n

Two specific construction starts. The 690 MW Turner River solar farm, which Fortescue says will need a little over one million panels to reach completion in 2028. And the 74 MW \/ 650 MWh battery at Cloudbreak, scheduled for fiscal 2027, made up of 124 individual units co-located with an existing 190 MW solar plant at the same site. International Mining<\/a> confirmed the BYD supply contract for the Cloudbreak battery.<\/p>\n

Turner River is the last solar farm Fortescue says it needs to build to reach its Real Zero target \u2014 the elimination of all scope 1 and scope 2 emissions from its terrestrial iron ore operations. Added to Solomon Airport (440 MW), Cloudbreak (190 MW), and North Star Junction (100 MW), it brings the company’s total Pilbara solar capacity above 1.4 gigawatts. The wind side is a separate workstream, anchored for now by the 133 MW Nullagine Wind Farm that is currently under construction. The remaining 470-odd MW of wind capacity is not.<\/p>\n

Fortescue has 480 kilometers of high-voltage transmission already in the ground linking the new generation to its mines, rail spurs, and port facilities at Port Hedland. The plan is to grow that to more than 620 kilometers by the time the system is fully integrated in 2028. The whole assembly will run as an islanded network. It will not be connected to the Australian national electricity market.<\/p>\n

The bigger number, and where it came from<\/h2>\n

The capex figure Fortescue has formally committed to in its April 2026 corporate announcement is AUD 3.56 billion, or about USD 2.5 billion<\/a>. A larger figure, USD 6.2 billion, has been quoted in some coverage. That number comes from a LinkedIn post by Daniel Hewitt, Fortescue’s Health, Safety, and R&D Superintendent, who also projected diesel-related operating cost savings of USD 818 million per year from 2030 onward. “It would pay itself back in a few years by slashing diesel-related opex costs,” Hewitt wrote. Hewitt’s figure appears to include ancillary infrastructure beyond the Green Grid itself. For investor purposes, the number on the record is the smaller one.<\/p>\n

On the procurement side, Dino Otranto, Fortescue’s CEO of Metals and Operations, told analysts in January that the company had locked in battery pricing at levels not previously seen<\/a> in the Australian market. He declined to give specific commercial terms. “Pretty confident that we’ve secured large-scale BESS at pricing that hasn’t really been seen, certainly in Australia before,” Otranto said on the call. Coming from a company that ships its iron ore on long-term contracts and is generally not in the habit of overstating its procurement wins, the line is unusual.<\/p>\n

Three Chinese vendors, no apologies<\/h2>\n

BYD, the Shenzhen-based EV and battery maker, supplies the cells. LONGi, headquartered in Xi’an, supplies the solar modules. Envision Energy, out of Shanghai, supplies the wind turbines. All three are at or near the top of their respective global rankings. None of them are American. A Fortescue spokesperson confirmed the three contracts to Energy-Storage.News and its sister publication PV Tech<\/a> in April.<\/p>\n

The reason Fortescue’s procurement looks the way it does is that, in 2026, the lowest-cost utility-scale renewable hardware in the world is built in China. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was supposed to chip away at that pattern by subsidizing domestic U.S. manufacturing of solar panels, batteries, and wind turbine components. Whether that policy is still doing the work it was designed to do, halfway through a second Trump administration, is a separate question. Fortescue’s answer, expressed through purchase orders rather than press releases, is no.<\/p>\n

What this iron ore eventually becomes<\/h2>\n

Fortescue shipped 198.4 million metric tons of iron ore in fiscal 2025, the largest year in the company’s history, and is guiding to between 195 and 205 million tons for fiscal 2026. The ore goes mostly to Chinese steelmakers. From there, the steel feeds into automotive supply chains, into construction rebar, into shipbuilding, into the appliance market, and a smaller portion eventually finds its way into goods sold in the United States, including vehicles. If the iron ore comes out of the ground starting in 2028 on renewable electricity rather than diesel, the scope 3 emissions of every downstream buyer of that ore go down. The buyer does not have to lift a finger.<\/p>\n

The other piece, the one harder to talk about in a corporate sustainability report, is what is actually generating the electricity. Chinese solar panels, Chinese batteries, Chinese turbines, mining Australian iron ore that ends up as steel for, among other things, American cars. The carbon math is real. The supply chain math is uncomfortable. Both are true.<\/p>\n

The Arizona footnote<\/h2>\n

Andrew Forrest, Fortescue’s executive chair, has been loud about hydrogen for the better part of a decade. He told Axios in May 2024<\/a> that “projects we have across North America will stop” if the Biden administration did not adjust its implementation of the IRA’s 45V hydrogen production tax credit. That part of his quote was, at the time, treated as a negotiating posture. It turned out not to be.<\/p>\n

On July 24, 2025, Fortescue confirmed it was abandoning the 80 MW Buckeye facility, where site work had begun fourteen months earlier, and the 50 MW Gladstone project in Queensland. The combined write-off was approximately $150 million in pre-tax losses. Gus Pichot, the company’s CEO of Growth and Energy, told investors on the earnings call that “a shift in policy priorities away from green energy has changed the situation in the U.S.” He did not say which administration. He did not have to.<\/p>\n

The executive order that triggered the cancellation, signed in the opening days of the second Trump term and titled Unleashing American Energy, paused federal funding for hydrogen and related clean-energy programs. The 2025 reconciliation bill that followed it scaled back the 45V tax credit. Neither piece of policy made the project illegal. They made it uneconomic.<\/p>\n

What hasn’t been built yet<\/h2>\n

The wind capacity is mostly still on paper. 133 MW of the 600-plus MW target is under construction at Nullagine. The other 470-odd MW has been planned, costed, and committed, but not poured. The battery-electric haul truck fleet that is supposed to replace diesel mining equipment is in early stages. Fortescue expects its first battery-electric haul truck in service before the end of 2026, supported by an in-house 6 MW fast charger that recharges a truck in roughly 30 minutes. Sixteen electric excavators and one electric drill are already operating. About half the excavator fleet is expected to be electric by year-end. A wheel loader, dozer, grader, and water cart from XCMG \u2014 another Chinese vendor \u2014 are in final prototype testing before being trucked out to the Pilbara.<\/p>\n

None of that is the same as proving that an iron ore operation can run a continuous twenty-four-hour mining cycle on renewable electricity, without diesel sitting somewhere in the background as a backup. Fortescue says it will demonstrate that capability later in 2027. Whether the iron ore that comes out of the Pilbara in 2028 reaches the U.S. market tariffed or untariffed is, at this point, a trade-policy question and not a mining one. Neither of those uncertainties changes what happened on Monday. They just mean that what happened on Monday was the easy part.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Monday, Fortescue Ltd. began turning dirt in Western Australia’s Pilbara on the latest piece of what its corporate communications … <\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":8969,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[116,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy","category-news","resize-featured-image"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8973,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8963\/revisions\/8973"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}