{"id":21703,"date":"2026-10-02T14:00:24","date_gmt":"2026-10-02T18:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/?p=21703"},"modified":"2026-10-02T12:47:48","modified_gmt":"2026-10-02T16:47:48","slug":"tallest-wind-turbine-1198-feet-locked","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/tallest-wind-turbine-1198-feet-locked\/","title":{"rendered":"A 1,198-foot wind turbine in eastern Germany just locked in at full height, its hub now sits 49 feet above the blade tips of the 935-foot machine that held the record, and the whole country has exactly one structure left standing taller \u2014 by about 10 feet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A week ago, the tallest wind turbine ever built stood in eastern Germany at partial height, waiting for calmer air so it could finish growing. That wait is over.<\/p>\n<p>We covered that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/turbine-1198-feet-blades-wind\/\">strange, slow-motion climb<\/a> when it stalled. If you don&#8217;t wanna read it (I get it, we can&#8217;t all read about turbines during a work day), the short version is that it builds itself near the ground, then pushes its own top up through a lattice tower, because there&#8217;s no crane on Earth that reaches high enough to do it the normal way.<\/p>\n<p>On September 28th, the inner tower locked into its final position at the Schipkau site in Brandenburg. The structure now runs 1,198 feet (365 meters) from the ground to the tip of its highest blade, with the hub sitting 984 feet up. That&#8217;s the tallest wind turbine in the world and the second-tallest structure in Germany, with only the Berlin TV Tower, about 10 feet taller, still ahead of it.<\/p>\n<p>GICON, the Dresden engineering group that designed and built the thing, declared the milestone the next day. &#8220;365 meters \u2013 this is an overwhelming moment for our entire team,&#8221; said founder Jochen Gro\u00dfmann in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gicon.de\/aktuelles\/artikel\/gicon-hoehenwindturm-erreicht-weltrekordhoehe-von-365-metern\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">company&#8217;s announcement<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It was a well-earned moment. The lift was supposed to wrap up around September 20th, and it didn&#8217;t, because gusts kept shutting the work down. By September 27th, the structure had only crept to 1,033 feet. There was more tension here than in an episode of Love is Blind, but that&#8217;s what happens when you&#8217;re dealing with something that actually matters instead of trying to marry a gaslighting stranger after a few weeks of knowing them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Safety comes before speed,&#8221; Gro\u00dfmann told the German press agency dpa while everyone waited.<\/p>\n<h2>So how did they finish it without a crane?<\/h2>\n<p>If you read our first piece, you know the basic trick, so I&#8217;ll keep this short. (It&#8217;s worth taking a break from answering emails, trust me.) GICON built an outer lattice tower about 525 feet tall, assembled the nacelle and the three blades at that height, where cranes can still work, and then pushed a slimmer inner tower up through the outer one with the whole 827-ton turbine package riding on top.<\/p>\n<p>Strand jacks did the pushing. A strand jack is basically a hydraulic gripper that climbs a bundle of steel cables a few inches at a stroke, and bridge crews use the same gear to lift whole road decks into place. Here, a set of them walked the inner tower up at about 30 feet per hour until the hub hit 984 feet, and the tower got pinned in its extended position. SPRIND, the German federal innovation agency that commissioned the project, says in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sprind.org\/en\/words\/magazine\/wind-turbine-record\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">its write-up<\/a> that the turbine &#8220;serves as its own crane,&#8221; which is about right.<\/p>\n<p>And the tower itself is a <em>beast<\/em>. According to the VDI trade outlet <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ingenieur.de\/fachmedien\/vdi-energie-umwelt\/energie-vdi-energie-umwelt\/erneuerbare-energien\/365-m-in-24-stunden-die-lausitz-baut-das-hochste-windrad-der-welt\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Ingenieur.de<\/a>, the lattice mast holds more than 2,200 tons of steel across some 22,000 individual parts.<\/p>\n<div style=\"display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 14px; margin: 24px 0;\">\n<div style=\"flex: 1 1 260px; min-width: 260px; background: #0f172a; color: #f1f5f9; border-radius: 14px; padding: 22px; border: 1px solid #1e293b;\">\n<div style=\"font-size: 11px; letter-spacing: 1.8px; text-transform: uppercase; color: #f87171; margin-bottom: 14px; font-weight: 600;\">Total height<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 30px; font-weight: 800; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 6px;\">1,198 ft<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 12px; color: #94a3b8; line-height: 1.4;\">Blade tip at full extension. About 10 feet under the Berlin TV Tower.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex: 1 1 260px; min-width: 260px; background: #0f172a; color: #f1f5f9; border-radius: 14px; padding: 22px; border: 1px solid #1e293b;\">\n<div style=\"font-size: 11px; letter-spacing: 1.8px; text-transform: uppercase; color: #f87171; margin-bottom: 14px; font-weight: 600;\">Hub height<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 30px; font-weight: 800; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 6px;\">984 ft<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 12px; color: #94a3b8; line-height: 1.4;\">49 feet above the blade tips of the old record holder.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex: 1 1 260px; min-width: 260px; background: #0f172a; color: #f1f5f9; border-radius: 14px; padding: 22px; border: 1px solid #1e293b;\">\n<div style=\"font-size: 11px; letter-spacing: 1.8px; text-transform: uppercase; color: #f87171; margin-bottom: 14px; font-weight: 600;\">Previous record<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 30px; font-weight: 800; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 6px;\">935 ft<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 12px; color: #94a3b8; line-height: 1.4;\">A series-built turbine in Bavaria, hub at 653 feet.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"flex: 1 1 260px; min-width: 260px; background: #0f172a; color: #f1f5f9; border-radius: 14px; padding: 22px; border: 1px solid #dc2626; position: relative;\">\n<div style=\"position: absolute; top: -10px; right: 16px; background: #dc2626; color: #fff; font-size: 10px; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: 1.2px; padding: 4px 10px; border-radius: 20px;\">TARGET<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 11px; letter-spacing: 1.8px; text-transform: uppercase; color: #f87171; margin-bottom: 14px; font-weight: 600;\">Switch-on<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 30px; font-weight: 800; line-height: 1; margin-bottom: 6px;\">November<\/div>\n<div style=\"font-size: 12px; color: #94a3b8; line-height: 1.4;\">Official commissioning of the 3.8-megawatt pilot.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>For a sense of how far this\u00a0<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;\">raises the bar, the previous tallest wind turbine on land is a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/turbine-hub-653-feet-bridges\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">935-foot production machine in Bavaria,<\/a> with a hub height of<\/span>\u00a0653 feet. The new tower&#8217;s hub alone sits 49 feet above that machine&#8217;s blade tips.<\/p>\n<h2>So what does all that height buy?<\/h2>\n<p>Wind a few hundred feet up blows harder and steadier, because it isn&#8217;t getting churned by trees, buildings, and terrain. You already know this if you&#8217;ve ever flown a kite at the beach. Or, well, watched it fly out of your hand in a gust of wind.<\/p>\n<p>Still, why should you trust the specific numbers? Partly because there&#8217;s a year of measured wind behind them. In 2022, SPRIND and GICON put up what they call the world&#8217;s tallest wind measurement mast on the same plateau, and it logged readings from May 2023 to May 2024. Based on that height advantage, GICON claims the turbine can deliver roughly double the energy of a conventional machine with the same rotor diameter. The German trade magazine Erneuerbare Energien ran its own calculations and arrived at a different result: up to 63% higher yield.<\/p>\n<p>Double and 63% aren&#8217;t the same claim, and frankly, both are <em>still<\/em> forecasts. We won&#8217;t get the real answer until the turbine has spun through a few seasons. GICON also hasn&#8217;t published what the tower costs to build, per Ingenieur.de, so I can&#8217;t tell you whether the extra electricity pays for the extra steel. The company&#8217;s own target for the pilot is at least 18 million kilowatt-hours a year, enough for about 6,000 households, from a 3.8-megawatt Vensys turbine swinging a 413-foot rotor. Future production units are planned to exceed 7 megawatts.<\/p>\n<h2>A 91-year-old inventor started all of this<\/h2>\n<p>While it&#8217;s all very sciency and numbery, there&#8217;s an interesting human story behind this incredible feat. The idea reached SPRIND in 2019 from Horst Bendix, a retired professor from Leipzig who&#8217;d spent years as head of technology and research at Kirow, the city&#8217;s crane and heavy machinery maker. Bendix was 91 when he pitched it, and he&#8217;d spent his retirement working out how to harvest the wind everybody else was building under. Makes you feel sorta unproductive, doesn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p>SPRIND liked the pitch enough to validate three competing concepts, and GICON, which had already put more than a decade into high-altitude wind, became the build partner. The agency runs the project through its subsidiary Beventum, and GICON&#8217;s announcement calls it the first leap innovation ever approved by SPRIND&#8217;s supervisory board. The foundation stone was laid in September 2024, so the tower went from bare ground to a world record in two years.<\/p>\n<p>In an industry where permits alone can take longer than that, I&#8217;d argue the timeline is more impressive than the height.<\/p>\n<h2>The next trick is a second floor for old wind farms<\/h2>\n<p>Now back to the business side of things. GICON and SPRIND say up to 4,000 of these towers could be retrofitted into existing German wind farms as a second tier, harvesting the air above turbines that typically top out between roughly 490 and 820 feet. Same land, same grid connections, extra power on top. That 4,000 figure comes from a potential study, so I wouldn&#8217;t pencil it into anyone&#8217;s grid plan yet. Still, GICON told Euronews in August that it plans around 100 high-altitude towers by the early 2030s and wants to scale to 1,000 after that.<\/p>\n<p>Stacking a second layer of generation over wind farms that already fought their permitting battles strikes me as a pretty clever way around Germany&#8217;s shortage of good sites. Whether anyone pays for it depends on those yield numbers holding up.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a few more days of finishing work left on the tower, and GICON says the official commissioning is planned for November. That&#8217;s when the tallest wind turbine ever built starts earning back its 2,200 tons of steel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A week ago, the tallest wind turbine ever built stood in eastern Germany at partial height, waiting for calmer air &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"A 1,198-foot wind turbine in eastern Germany just locked in at full height, its hub now sits 49 feet above the blade tips of the 935-foot machine that held the record, and the whole country has exactly one structure left standing taller \u2014 by about 10 feet\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/tallest-wind-turbine-1198-feet-locked\/#more-21703\" aria-label=\"Read more about A 1,198-foot wind turbine in eastern Germany just locked in at full height, its hub now sits 49 feet above the blade tips of the 935-foot machine that held the record, and the whole country has exactly one structure left standing taller \u2014 by about 10 feet\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":21711,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy","resize-featured-image"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21703"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21754,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21703\/revisions\/21754"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21711"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.autonocion.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}